<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LINQ To SQL Very Slow Performance Without Compile (CompileQuery)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/</link>
	<description>Specializing in Microsoft Web and Database Technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:27:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Preetham K A</title>
		<link>http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-27756</link>
		<dc:creator>Preetham K A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/#comment-27756</guid>
		<description>Hi, i need a clarification, am using 5 table information in a single query, i have used 3 tier Architecture, in this 3 tierarchitecture i used to get the complete data from the each table in to a LIST, then i will write a LINQ Query by using these 5 LIST, assuming each table has 5 thousand Records. Will this Task reduce the performance of the application?, howmuch time will it require than normal ADO.Net. 
PlZ Reply.... i need it Urgently, Thanks in Adv....  Preetham K A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, i need a clarification, am using 5 table information in a single query, i have used 3 tier Architecture, in this 3 tierarchitecture i used to get the complete data from the each table in to a LIST, then i will write a LINQ Query by using these 5 LIST, assuming each table has 5 thousand Records. Will this Task reduce the performance of the application?, howmuch time will it require than normal ADO.Net.<br />
PlZ Reply&#8230;. i need it Urgently, Thanks in Adv&#8230;.  Preetham K A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preetham</title>
		<link>http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-27755</link>
		<dc:creator>Preetham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/#comment-27755</guid>
		<description>Hi, i need a clarification, am using 5 table information in a single query, i have used</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, i need a clarification, am using 5 table information in a single query, i have used</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-26060</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/#comment-26060</guid>
		<description>It seems to me no matter what method you use, LINQ will always be massively slower than using stored procedures to execute sql commands and then allowing ado.net to retrieve the results.  Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me no matter what method you use, LINQ will always be massively slower than using stored procedures to execute sql commands and then allowing ado.net to retrieve the results.  Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unexpected benefits of Precompilation of LINQ &#171; The Lanit Development Blog</title>
		<link>http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-26010</link>
		<dc:creator>Unexpected benefits of Precompilation of LINQ &#171; The Lanit Development Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/#comment-26010</guid>
		<description>[...] of the tree to SQL &#8211; and it&#8217;s probably much bigger than you would think.  See http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/ to see what I mean.  In my analysis (using ANTS Profiler), when using uncompiled LINQ &#8211; the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the tree to SQL &#8211; and it&#8217;s probably much bigger than you would think.  See <a href="http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/">http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/</a> to see what I mean.  In my analysis (using ANTS Profiler), when using uncompiled LINQ &#8211; the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LINQ To SQL Very Slow Performance &#171; Omnia Connect Blog - COME, CLICK WITH US</title>
		<link>http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-25211</link>
		<dc:creator>LINQ To SQL Very Slow Performance &#171; Omnia Connect Blog - COME, CLICK WITH US</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 09:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/#comment-25211</guid>
		<description>[...] Interesting article by Perter Keller, shows how you can get drastic speed improvement by compiling LINQ Queries using System.Data.Linq.CompiledQuery Class in .NET. You can find a complete performance test and sample code, please follow the link  http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interesting article by Perter Keller, shows how you can get drastic speed improvement by compiling LINQ Queries using System.Data.Linq.CompiledQuery Class in .NET. You can find a complete performance test and sample code, please follow the link  http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arvind</title>
		<link>http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-25169</link>
		<dc:creator>Arvind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/#comment-25169</guid>
		<description>Everyone&#039;s talking about Linq-To-Sql...
what about Linq to object collections?
Xml??
with 0 optimization there... it suffers like HECk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone&#8217;s talking about Linq-To-Sql&#8230;<br />
what about Linq to object collections?<br />
Xml??<br />
with 0 optimization there&#8230; it suffers like HECk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Fast are In Memory LINQ Evaluations for Doing Simple Things? &#124; PeterKellner.net</title>
		<link>http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-24858</link>
		<dc:creator>How Fast are In Memory LINQ Evaluations for Doing Simple Things? &#124; PeterKellner.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/#comment-24858</guid>
		<description>[...] I recently blogged about the huge penalty for not compiling your LINQ2SQL.&#160; This problem is so big that it occurred to us that maybe all of LINQ has the problem.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I recently blogged about the huge penalty for not compiling your LINQ2SQL.&#160; This problem is so big that it occurred to us that maybe all of LINQ has the problem.&#160; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-24731</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/#comment-24731</guid>
		<description>Thanks Peter,  We are are all learning a lot about Linq to Sql (even since writing this 2 days ago)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Peter,  We are are all learning a lot about Linq to Sql (even since writing this 2 days ago)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bromberg</title>
		<link>http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-24730</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bromberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkellner.net/2009/05/06/linq-to-sql-slow-performance-compilequery-critical/#comment-24730</guid>
		<description>Nice work, Peter. My &quot;respect&quot; meter just went up about 3 notches for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work, Peter. My &#8220;respect&#8221; meter just went up about 3 notches for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 11/34 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.peterkellner.net

Served from: peterkellner.net @ 2010-07-30 09:26:21 -->