<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creating a Theme For Each Year of Code Camp Using Skins in ASP.NETBuilding the New Code Camp Web Site (Part 3)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterkellner.net/2008/05/25/codecampwebsiteseries3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterkellner.net/2008/05/25/codecampwebsiteseries3/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=codecampwebsiteseries3</link>
	<description>Microsoft Focused, JavaScript,HTML5 (ExtJS, SenchaTouch &#38; Windows 8 Metro)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:53:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syn Flex</title>
		<link>http://peterkellner.net/2008/05/25/codecampwebsiteseries3/#comment-28453</link>
		<dc:creator>Syn Flex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkellner.net/2008/05/25/codecampwebsiteseries3/#comment-28453</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been very involved with WordPress and the only experience I have had with ASP is removing malware from the sites. Recently, I was introduced to dotnukenet and was fairly impressed. I had no idea it was so easy to create themes like this. 

Is ASP still alive and well? I know a lot of real estate sites still use it but wasn&#039;t sure if it was trending down or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been very involved with WordPress and the only experience I have had with ASP is removing malware from the sites. Recently, I was introduced to dotnukenet and was fairly impressed. I had no idea it was so easy to create themes like this. </p>
<p>Is ASP still alive and well? I know a lot of real estate sites still use it but wasn&#8217;t sure if it was trending down or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://peterkellner.net/2008/05/25/codecampwebsiteseries3/#comment-27749</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkellner.net/2008/05/25/codecampwebsiteseries3/#comment-27749</guid>
		<description>I agree with Chris Plowman about the distinction.

Cheers to you both!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Chris Plowman about the distinction.</p>
<p>Cheers to you both!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: latexaddixct</title>
		<link>http://peterkellner.net/2008/05/25/codecampwebsiteseries3/#comment-25578</link>
		<dc:creator>latexaddixct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkellner.net/2008/05/25/codecampwebsiteseries3/#comment-25578</guid>
		<description>Hey very nice blog!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey very nice blog!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Plowman</title>
		<link>http://peterkellner.net/2008/05/25/codecampwebsiteseries3/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Plowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterkellner.net/2008/05/25/codecampwebsiteseries3/#comment-710</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter,

Nice article from a technical perspective; however, I would go a different way from a general web structure / design standpoint.

If your image is part of the theme, then I would argue that it is styling and not content.  That being the case, I think it would be far cleaner to handle the image in css.  Since your css file(s) would already be in the theme, the image would be a relative path and the issue goes away.

For images that are actual content, they would not change with the theme and should be stored in a separate folder.

Obviously this would not cover every scenario and your technique works perfectly when necessary, but as a general rule I always prefer keeping a clear distinction between style and content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>Nice article from a technical perspective; however, I would go a different way from a general web structure / design standpoint.</p>
<p>If your image is part of the theme, then I would argue that it is styling and not content.  That being the case, I think it would be far cleaner to handle the image in css.  Since your css file(s) would already be in the theme, the image would be a relative path and the issue goes away.</p>
<p>For images that are actual content, they would not change with the theme and should be stored in a separate folder.</p>
<p>Obviously this would not cover every scenario and your technique works perfectly when necessary, but as a general rule I always prefer keeping a clear distinction between style and content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 34/36 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: PetersBlogCDN.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: peterkellner.net @ 2012-05-21 09:38:10 -->
